Incite -- (v) 1: give an incentive; 2: provoke or stir up; "incite a riot"; 3: urge on; cause to act |
Monday, August 09, 2004
Written by: BeckAt first I read this article, and I thought maybe it wasn't true. After all, who the heck is WorldNetDaily? This seemed like the kind of thing which could easily be a mere shaky construction out of a few misconstrued quotes and a healthy dose of wishful thinking. Now CNN.com has picked up the story, and the last lair of denial has been stripped away. The United States State Department, in concert with the White House, at the encouragement of roughly a dozen fringe law makers, has invited international election observers to monitor the 2004 US presidential election. This is a terrible idea, and it is offensive to every single person who calls themselves an American citizen, regardless of political affiliation. I am shocked. First of all, as frequent mention of the 2000 Florida recount makes amply apparent, this constitutes a tacit acknowledgement that the system failed in 2000. I disagree. The courts exist to resolve disputes like what emerged in 2000, and they resolved them. While you might not agree with their conclusions, nonetheless, the courts performed the function they exist to perform, the nation abided by the court's ruling, and we had a president. Now, it seems, we're saying that rather than having a system which functions as intended, rather even than saying that there were problems with the Florida ballots--evidently paper is too stiff for all the elderly folks their to successfully punch holes in it--we're saying that we can't even successfully manage an election on our own. We aspire to be the world's most powerful nation--we tell the rest of the world to behave, to follow the rules, and threaten them with violence should they not fall in line. And yet we can't even run an election on our own soil. How is our foreign policy, much of which hinges on encouraging democracy abroad, be taken seriously if we can't even run elections at home? And of course we can run elections at home without help from a gaggle of Europeans. It's a fairly simple procedure, we've been doing it for over 200 years now. As such, one can only conclude that the motives behind introducing international observers is some sort of political pandering or maneuvering of the worst kind. The game of politics reaches a point where it completely leaves behind principle, and instead, every action and every word are scripted in an attempt to garner a few more votes and outmaneuver political opponents. We have finally reached the point where no thought is given to whether something is right or wrong, and all thought is given to how a particular scheme will play with the press. And one final note--I'm sick of hearing criticism of Republican behavior during the recount, and I'm sick of hearing that it was an attempt to disenfranchise minorities. Gore only called for recounts in counties which were heavily populated by minorities because he knew he stood to gain the most there. The Bush camp opposed them straight up, and did not call for recounts in counties full of counties full of conservative retirees. Had the entire state been recounted, then based on the way un-recounted counties had leaned, the most likely outcome is that Bush would have actually gained votes. It was Gore who tried to lean on the politics of race to steal the election, not Bush. Furthermore, the Gore camp tried to obstruct thousands of legitimately cast absentee ballots from soldiers stationed abroad. In other words, Bush opposed a ludicrously biased recount process, while Gore opposed legitimately cast ballots. So enough with the "Republicans stole the election," whining--you're convincing everyone new, and you're causing those who've paid attention to the actual facts to lose respect for you. As for a few of the details from the CNN article: The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe was invited to monitor the election by the State Department. The observers will come from the OSCE's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.The facts: there are 55 signatories to the OSCE, but only 30 nations in 10 years have had OSCE observers. In other words, the OSCE is needed in places where interference with the democratic process is expected. They are not needed in nations where elections are handled in a routine and peaceful manner. The United States of America is the home and heart of that nebulous principle known as democracy. Anything which suggests or implies that we are not qualified or capable of successfully executing the democratic process strikes a blow to US legitimacy and is an insult to US citizens. I cannot believe that the State Department, in league with the White House, has bent to pressure and acceded to election monitoring. (Hat tip: The Rottweiler & Spatula City)
|
Contact The Author:
John Beck Feedback Welcomed
Greatest Hits
The Complete United Nations Posts Immoderate Moderates Marketing Myopia In defense of the Republic UKIP in America Playing Connect the Dots A Point So Often Missed: The Presence of an Administered Rate Reagan Remembrance Dr. Wolfowitz, or How I Supported the Right War Waged in the Wrong Way for the Wrong Reasons Divine Right of Kings and UN Mandates A Fantastic Idea, If I Do Say So Myself Why We Were Right to Liberate Iraq The Crisis of Conservatism
Blogs Worth Bookmarking
Steal The Blinds Poor Dudley's Almanac Mansizedtarget Protein Wisdom Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler New Sisyphus Iowahawk Jim Treacher Ace of Spades Captain's Quarters Rambling's Journal Neolibertarian Blog LLP Group Blog The Llama Butchers The Castle Argghhh The Politburo Diktat The Dissident Frogman In Search of Utopia Aaron's cc: TacJammer Wizbang Q&O IMAO INDC You Know You Wanna Classical Values Clowning Glory Vice Squad Samizdata Hit & Run Link Mecca The Corner Power Line Instapundit Michelle Malkin Mises Institute marchand chronicles Enlighten - New Jersey
More Top Reads
Ego SlagleRock's Slaughterhouse a_sdf This Blog is Full of Crap Redstate Who Tends the Fires The Bleat Outside the Beltway gapingvoid Small Dead Animals Kim du Toit Tman in Tennessee mypetjawa mASS BACKWARDS Hog On Ice Pardon My English Mr. Minority Speed Of Thought Bloodletting La Shawn Barber Vodkapundit Right Wing News USS Clueless LeatherPenguin Belmont Club Shades of Gray Seldom Sober Roger L. Simon Tacoma Blaze A Small Victory Murdoc Online Iraq Elections Diatribe Winds of Change Wuzzadem Enlighten - New Jersey Random Fate Riding Sun My VRWC The Daily File Matt "The Man" Margolis Bastard Sword Roller Coaster of Hate
News Links
Blogger News Network National Review Online Tech Central Station The Drudge Report Reason Online Mises Institute The Weekly Standard Front Page Magazine Town Hall VDARE
Affiliations, Accolades, & Acknowledgements
NEOLIBERTARIAN NETWORK LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY ALLIANCE OF FREE BLOGS "More tallent than a million monkeys with typewriters." --Glenn Reynolds BEST CONSERVATIVE BLOG NOMINEE EMPIRE OF THE BLOGS BLOGS FOR BUSH
Life, Liberty, Property Community
Reciprocal Blogrolling
Yippee-Ki-Yay! Accidental Verbosity Conservative Eyes The Moderate Voice Perpetual Three-Dot Column Chapomatic Sudan Watch Mystery Achievement Le Sabot Post-Moderne Comment Me No Comments New Spew
Links That Amuse the Writers
Huffington's Toast The IFOC News Dave Barry's Blog Drum Machine Something Awful Fight! Cox & Forkum Fark Exploding Dog
Archives
March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 August 2006 March 2007 May 2007 June 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 September 2008 November 2008 December 2008 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009
The Elephant Graveyard
We Are Full of Shit The Sicilian The Diplomad Undercaffeinated Insults Unpunished Fear & Loathing in Iraq Right Wingin-It DGCI Serenity's Journal Son of Nixon Rachel Lucas
Credits
Popdex Email Questions and Comments This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |