Before I said that the only right most countries have is the right to have your head on a pike if you are unpopular. Actually owning property isn't a right even
here, at least not yet. Anything you own can be taken from you if a
government clerk,
corporate boss,
evil dictator, or
genocidal fucktard wants it.
It would seem that
your stuff isn't yours, but because all of this works through government agencies, it is yours if you're popular enough to keep the government on your side. It's the people who aren't popular who don't get to keep anything. Do we really want property rights determined by who has the better PR guy? Let's hope the Supreme Court doesn't
think so. It's not like their planet is about to be
destroyed for a new bypass, so why should they
worry, as long as
bread is cheap.
This also highlights why the
libertarian movement in the United States is imbecilic. They're more concerned with making narcotics cheap, legal, and common.
Goe, apologizing again for the
lack of other writers on
someone else's
blog.
